
| ||||||||||||||||||
Kevin Pelton, storm.wnba.com
It's impossible to say how Game 1 would have played out with the Sparks staying to their regular-season strengths or whether the lineup change played a factor in the team's slow start (more likely caused by the raucous atmosphere at KeyArena), but we can look at how various lineup combinations fared for the Sparks in Game 1.
Bryant played traditional backcourts for a total of just 8:10, mostly during the second quarter. With these lineups on the floor, the Sparks were -1, meaning the Storm outscored Los Angeles by one point combined. Supersized lineups - essentially any one that had Holdsclaw in the backcourt - played 19:26 and were +7. The Sparks were +4 with Holdsclaw at shooting guard and +3 during a brief stretch in the first half where she played alongside rookie
Lisa Willis in the backcourt and essentially served as the WNBA's tallest point guard. So where was this game lost? It was with a hybrid lineup that featured Mabika at shooting guard alongside one of the Sparks normal point guards, either
Temeka Johnson or
Doneeka Hodges-Lewis. Mabika at shooting guard isn't extremely unorthodox, but she's typically a small forward, and Los Angeles was an astounding -18 in the 12:24 that these lineups played, including nearly all of the decisive fourth quarter. However, Mabika played decently, scoring 11 points and hitting 3-of-10 3-pointers, so the result may have been more about the lineups the Storm had the floor and the randomness of a 12-minute sample size.
While the Storm's Game 1 victory over the Sparks was monumental, the task of defeating Los Angeles is hardly finished. Now the series shifts to the Staples Center, where the Sparks were a dominant 15-2 this season. The good news is the Storm was one of two teams to go into Staples and win this season, earning a 75-67 victory in late June despite playing without
Lauren Jackson because of soreness in her left shin.
Entering this season, the lower-seeded team had won Game 1 of a best-of-three series on its home court 21 times. These teams rarely enjoyed a sweep, however, going a dismal 3-18 in Game 2 of the series. They had much more success in Game 3, going 5-13 for an overall 8-13 record needing one road win to take the series. What explains teams having less success in Game 2 than the pressure-packed, do-or-die Game 3? It may be due to the fact that losing teams usually have more and better adjustments available to them than winning teams. Potential Sparks adjustments, presuming Bryant wants to continue his big lineup ploy, seem somewhat limited. The Storm could still stand to improve its rebounding in this game after allowing the Sparks to rebound 47.2% of their own misses in Game 1.
During today's game, check out storm.wnba.com's inaugural "Live From My Couch," with Kevin Pelton live-blogging off of ESPN 2's and KJR's coverage.
| G U A R D S | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() |
Anne Donovan spoke before Game 1 about the importance of |
![]() |
![]() |
Holdsclaw was limited to a little more than nine minutes in the first half after straining her left foot, but she gamely played the first 18-plus minutes of the second half before the game was decided, scoring 13 points and grabbing nine rebounds. |
![]() |
F O R W A R D S |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
C E N T E R |
![]() |
Leslie, bothered much of the game by foul trouble, had a team-high 15 points but committed five turnovers and scored just two points in the final period. Leslie was most effective on the offensive glass, getting five offensive rebounds and turning them into nine points for the Sparks (seven herself). |
![]() |
B E N C H |
![]() |
Mabika (right) took on the role of zone-buster in Game 1, attempting 10 3-pointers in 25 minutes of action. Mabika brought the Sparks back in the game late in the second quarter, but her only score in five post-halftime attempts came in the final seconds with the game long decided. |
![]() |

